The British model of policing must be nurtured
25 November 2009—It is time to reassert the principles of the traditional British model of approachable, impartial and accountable policing based on minimum force for major public order events, Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Constabulary says today.Introducing the second part of HMIC's review of policing protest, he warns that winning public order through tactics that appear to be unfair, aggressive or inconsistent risks losing public consent by damaging the reputation of the police service and individual officers alike.
He stressed that the principles of the traditional model are well suited to handling the highly- charged, high-profile events that have challenged conventional public order policing tactics, training and leadership in recent years, compared with others on offer internationally.
Mr O'Connor said these events are small in number and differ in character from everyday policing because they include protesters who are highly mobile and are well versed in exercising their rights and testing legal boundaries.
The protesters are also intent on securing support nationally and internationally using modern technology and a strong message.
Even so, said Mr O'Connor, the British policing model, first articulated by Sir Robert Peel, is well suited to the challenges of these highly-charged events.
The British model is an approachable, impartial and accountable style of policing based on minimum force. It is designed to win public consent through tolerance and is adaptable to modern crowd dynamics and the increase in demands on police forces to support each other during public order operations.
The Chief Inspector said protests like those at Kingsnorth (Kent), Blackheath (London) and more recently in Leeds, Manchester and Birmingham should be seen as critical events, where the effectiveness of the police response has the potential to impact on wider public confidence.
During these events, officers are very much on display. And he warned the British model can be undermined if formidable public order uniform and tactics are perceived to dominate, the law is misused, the police appear to take sides or thoughtless acts of aggression are perceived to have occurred.
Mr O'Connor said: "British police risk losing the battle for the public's consent if they win public order through tactics that appear to be unfair, aggressive or inconsistent. This harms not just the reputation of the individual officers concerned but the police service as a whole."
He warned that public order events have exposed inconsistencies in the training, standards and leadership of public order policing, in particular:
Mr O'Connor added: "The world is changing and policing needs to change with it. Public order policing needs to evolve as we move towards the London Olympics in 2012 and beyond. This will protect the rights of protesters and the wider public as well as protecting the integrity of the British policing model."
The report makes a number of other recommendations, including:
Click to download the attached file(s):
More from Security Source | Top of Page
Useful article? Use these tools to let someone know:
Send & Share | Print | Access RSS Feed for Syndication
